Ethical decision making for Procter And Gamble Essay

Procter & Gamble (PG) is a global investor, a beau monde that is al carriages on fall erupt of market and reinforcing its deformity names as being at the top of the pack. One example of how the company has used social media to reinforce its shuffle and then offer a short term income play. The creativity in marketing today discount be awed when hotshot uses social net functional in combination with brand aw beness. And this type of quick thinking and aw arness can hatful a company apart, contributing to sales. Procter and Gamble is a great example of this. P&G has a purpose to keep current on events that happen through with(predicate) the day that could take a shit an impact on its brands. It looks for things that could possibly have a direct attitude upon loyal customers. In one instance, for example, the Tide brand came to the rescue after a fiery explosion during the Dayton 500 c all overed the Speed vogue with 200 gallons of burning fuel. TV viewers watched track work ers using Tide to clean the track during a two-hour delay in the expectant American Race. Corporate Governance is the interaction of the commission, shareholders and Board of Directors to help moderate that all investorsboth shareholders and creditorsare protected against managers acting solely in their let best interest. Corporate Governance consists of laws, policies, procedures and, most importantly, practices that hear the wellspring-being of the assets of the Company. Corporate Governance is at its highest levels when management acts as if they are long-run investors in the Company.The policies, procedures and practices spelled out in this section demonstrate that Procter & Gamble opts Corporate Governance very seriously. Our management acts as long-run investors of the Company because they, like most Procter & Gamble employees at all levels, are in fact long-term investors.Employees Are Long-Term InvestorsIn 1887, before P&G was even a publicly traded company, William cooper Procter introduced a cyberspace-sharing programme for employees. At the time he verbalize, We should let the employees share in the truehearteds earnings. That will give them an incentive to increase earnings. He revised that program in 1903 to have the profit sharing be awarded in the form of actual P&G stock. He reasoned that as employees became stockholders, their economic interests and those of the Company would be bound more closely together.That program still exists today with a large part of each U.S. employees retirement consisting of P&G stock. Additionally, virtually all employees own P&G stock or stock rights via various investment programs. Because of that fact, employees economic interests are line up to those of the Company.Further, our Executive Share Ownership Program requires senior executives to own shares of Company stock and/or curb stock units valued at octette times base salary for the Chief Executive Officer, and five dollar bill times base sa lary for the other senior executives. Non-employee directors must own Company stock and/or restricted stock units worth six times their annual cash retainer. These compensation programs help to ensure the alignment of the interests of our senior executives and directors with shareholders.A Foundation of Integrity, Control and StewardshipP&G has a strong report of operating with integrity throughout the Companyat all levels, in all countries, both internally and externally. Our actions and the actions of all our employees are governed by our Purpose, Values and Principles. The basis for every decision we declare at P&G can be found in our Purpose, Values and Principlesour PVPs. The clarity and constancy of the Companys PVPs is the one constituent above all others that has driven the Companys growth over extensions. Our allegiance to operate responsibly is reflected in the steps we have in place to ensure rigorous pecuniary discipline and Corporate Governance. We have an active , capable and diligent Board of Directors that meets the required standards of independence, with members who understand their role in providing strong Corporate Governance. Our visit Committee is comprised exclusively of independent directors, with significant financial knowledge and experience. The Audit Committee also meets regularly in private session with the Companys independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP. We introduce a strong internal control environment. Our rigorous business process controls include written policies and procedures, segregation of duties and the careful selection and development of employees. The system is designed to provide reasonable assurance that transactions are executed as authorized andappropriately recorded, that assets are safeguarded and that accounting records are sufficiently reliable to countenance the preparation of financial statements conforming in all material respects with accounting principles in the main legitimate in the U.S . We monitor these internal controls through an ongoing program of audit self-assessment and internal and external audits. We get disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that instruction required to be disclosed is recorded, processed, summarized and reported in a timely and accurate manner. Our Disclosure Committee is comprised of senior-level executives responsible for evaluating disclosure implications of significant business activities and events. We execute financial stewardship by maintaining specific programs and activities to ensure that employees understand their fiduciary responsibilities to shareholders. This ongoing effort encompasses financial discipline in strategic and daily business decisions and brings particular focus to maintaining accurate financial reporting and effective controls. In addition, our Global Leadership Council is actively involved in rigorous oversight of the business. We reinforce key employee responsibilities through the Companys widely distributed Business Conduct, which details managements and the Board of Directors commitment to transmit the Companys business affairs with high respectable standards. Every employee is required to be trained on the Companys Worldwide Business Conduct Manual, and every employee is held personally accountable for compliance. Portions of the Worldwide Business Conduct Manual comprise P&Gs Code of Ethics for southward and New York Stock Exchange Regulatory Purposes, as further described in the Manual.Doing Whats beneficialP&Gs reputation is earned by our conduct what we say, what we do, the products we make, the services we provide and the way we act and treat others. As conscientious citizens and employees, we want to do what is right. For P&G, and our global operations, this is the just way to do business. A.2.1.5.1. External reporting on social/ethical issues 100.0% A+ The company provides comprehensive and miasmic social/ethical reporting on a regular basis. Coverag e Group-wide coverage (= 100% of employees arecovered by reporting). Comment The company reports on social/ethical issues in its Sustainability Reports and on its incorporated website as well as affiliated websites (www.scienceinthebox.com, www.pgbeautyscience.com). The company provides information on employees (diversity and health & safety entropy, layoffs/outplacement programs, training, working conditions), product responsibility, as well as on its community involvement and philanthropic initiatives. In addition, P&G reports on HSE non-compliance and fines. virtually issues in the report are covered in-depth (e.g. community initiatives, diversity, training and consumer information). Some issues, however, are exclusively covered in a rather general way (e.g. working conditions). obscure from policies and standards, there is only little information on the companys supply chain management much(prenominal) as on supplier audits or counseling with regard to social issues. The companys 2007 sustainability report was prepared using the Global Reporting Initiatives reporting guidelines. No information is available whether the report has been audited by an external accountant. BATAVIA, Ohio (AdAge.com) Procter & Gamble Co. and Unilever have battled over many things over the decades, from lather shares to spy scandals. But the belatedlyst battleground may be the most surprising and intriguing a race to show whos best at saving the humanness. P&G Global market Officer Jim StengelP&G Global Marketing Officer Jim StengelNothing indicates the growing hold ethical marketing has on the industry better than the concepts growing embrace by the worlds two biggest spenders. While both have been engaged in such efforts for years, theyre public lecture most them, and particularly advertising them, like never before.No less than Bill gate recently mentioned Unilever as a top-of-mind example of a company involved in sustainability efforts in a CNBC call into ques tion from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. Unilever also won top honors in global ethical-reputation rankings from PR-monitoring firm Covalence in 2007 and Columbia Universitys Botwinick Prize in business ethics, in part for such efforts as Doves Campaign for Real Beauty which aims to reach 5 million girls with vanity programs.In fact, the line between doing good and marketing has become blurry enough that Doves Evolution viral video had to be yanked from a non-for-profit classification at the last minute to delimitate for last years Film Grand Prix at Cannes.The same day as Mr. Gates interview, P&G indicated it would be communicating about its sustainability efforts defined to encompass a broad vagabond of community-betterment programs a much bigger priority in 2008.P&G goes beyondIt will be hard to do more communicating than P&G already has done. At least eight P&G brands have active ad campaigns touting environmental or philanthropic efforts, everything from Always and Tampax support efforts to keep African girls in school by providing them with free sanitary-protection products to Pantene collecting locks of hair for cancer patients. two of those efforts already are leading to new-product launches, in the cases of Pantene and Pur water filters, the latter having switched ad agencies in part to invoke its cause-related marketing.Though both P&G and Unilever see prospects for substantial gains from such efforts on their bottom lines and for the communities in which they operate, both acknowledge that much of the effort is for internal consumption. Simply put, its getting impossible to tear or retain marketers without a solid reputation for ethical marketing.We are seeing, particularly with the new generation of young business people and young marketers, that they are only attracted to companies that fit with their own value set, said Kevin Havelock, president of Unilever U.S. And the value set of the new generation is one that says th is company must take a positive and global view on the global environment. The ethical functions we take on brands like Dove, the positions we take on non using models of size zero across any of our brands, the positions we take in scathe of adding back to communities these all underpin an attractiveproposition for marketers.Its a similar story at P&G, which has had a fairly long tradition of marketers leaving for philanthropic or religious pursuits.Cause-marketing efforts have a big motivational impact, said P&G Global Marketing Officer Jim Stengel. It fires the agencies up, too. It entirely feels like youre playing to a higher-order ideal.Telling everyoneBut neither P&G nor Unilever is proficient preaching to the choir anymore, or even limiting the message to its long-standing public-relations silo. Theyre increasingly incorporating their cause marketing into mainstream brand advertising and product assortments.P&Gs Pur has one of the most elaborate cause-marketing efforts a $20 million program that aims to purify 2 billion liters of water in Africa and save 10,000 lives by 2012.New Age as the program may be, the ads are classic package goods. The Pur water-purification packets make for an amazing product demo. Take the most turbid swamp water imaginable, mix in a sachet of Pur Purifier of water and strain it through a cloth. Within a minute or so, it produces a pitcher of absolutely clear, drinkable water.The trouble is, the people who need it most have no money. Hence it became one of the home projects in the companys global Live, Learn, Thrive philanthropic program, albeit with a commercial twist.P&G has licensed the product to Canadas Reliance Products for a U.S. launch aimed at campers and disaster-preparedness kits that broke in late February behind a feature in P&Gs March and April Brand deliverer newspaper coupon inserts.Saatchi gets in the gameThough those ads for the P&G-Reliance effort came from Quigley-Simpson, a Los Angeles direct-re sponse agency, Purs modify to a sustainability message played a role in the shift of the brands original account to Omnicom Groups TBWA/Chiat Day, Playa Del Rey, Calif., from Publicis Groupes Saatchi & Saatchi, Los Angeles, last year.Saatchi lost Pur, but the agency has definitely not given up on sustainability. In January, Saatchi acquired San Francisco-based consultancy Act Now Productions, channeled by former Sierra monastic order executive turned Wal-Mart consultant Adam Werbach, to form a Saatchi & Saatchi S (for sustainability).The growing interest in sustainability issues from P&G, Unilever, Wal-Mart and others is creating ripples of change throughout marketing services. ARS Group, which for decades has tested TV reproduction for P&G and others in package-goods, recently formed its own greens consulting unit, ARSGreen.What ARS is finding underlines the big reason that sustainability has become so normal with analytical package-goods types it works at least sometimes.G reen ads in the ARS database do about as well as others on recall and persuasion, said Ashley Grace, president of ARSGreen and head of research and development for ARS Group. Doing about total is actually a testament to sustainabilitys selling power, as he sees it.Offering solutionsIn our database, about one out of 50 ads usually has a negative tone, Mr. Grace said. In the green data set, its more like 75%. ARS has found for decades that negative ads which raise a problem without whirl a real solution usually fare poorly in tests. But negative green ads generally do about average. And green ads that go the extra step of offering tangible solutions can sometimes score exceptionally well. Ashley Grace, president of ARSGreen and head of research and development for ARS Group Ashley Grace, president of ARSGreen and head of research and development for ARS GroupWhile many in the package-goods industry believe sustainability messages resonate with only about 10% to 15% of consumers, A RS research indicates such appeals can sway about two-thirds of people, including 24% in the hard-core health and sustainability segment who rate both personal and environmental health highly.To be sure, copy testing is widely loathed by advertising agencies, particularly creatives. But marketers such as P&G use the results because they correlate with sales results.Its clear that ethical marketing really can make a difference in peoples lives. For example, since P&Gs Pantene launched its Beautiful Lengths program in 2006 to solicit locks of hair to be woven into wigs for women receiving cancer treatments, it has gotten enough donations to make 3,000 wigs. Compare that to the 2,000 wigs created over 10 years by the previously existing charity in the space, Locks of Love.It doesnt hurt P&G, of course, that Oprah snipped the locks of Hilary Swank on air for one of those wigs, or that schoolgirls have organized events to collect hundreds of hair donations at once. Oh, and it dovetails n icely with the launch of Pantene Beautiful Lengths shampoo and conditioner later this year to care for those long locks.Mitigating factorsOf course, such programs only work if other factors, such as product and pricing, are also right. For example, P&G Chairman-CEO A.G. Lafley place the U.S. Pantene business as the only real problem in the companys global hair-care portfolio in a January investor conference call, but the share losses date to the brands restage last year, not to the launch of Beautiful Lengths a year earlier. Unilevers Campaign for Real Beauty, while very much alive, last year stopped delivering double-digit sales gains Unilever had seen the first two years of the effort. Doves 2007s new-product lineup didnt go over as well as prior years (and a price hike on bar soap, not initially reciprocated by P&G and others, didnt help, either).By whatever name ethical, sustainable or cause marketing is an important secondary factor for consumers, said Unilevers Mr. Havelock. A great product at the right price is the entry point, he said. Once there, a company or a brand that has a social responsibility position or a sustainability position will then have an edge over other brands.Of course, in an age of social media, marketings good deeds seldom go entirely unpunished, and never unquestioned. Even P&Gs ads about efforts to provide free sanitary protection in Africa to help keep girls from missing school, which broke in December from Publicis Groupes Leo Burnett Co., have prompted protracted discussions on some blogs criticizing the motives in using giveaways to develop new markets and generating more waste as a result.When you do it in the right way, with the right tone and authenticity, consumers reward us for these programs, Mr. Stengel said, citing Pampers 20-country, multiyear effort to fight tetanus via Unicef as the P&G program that appears to have had the biggest positive impact on sales and brand equity to date.Such programs work best when o wned by the brand, which is why P&G, like Unilever, has generally avoided multi-company efforts such as the Red campaign to fight AIDS or the Susan G. Komen pink-ribbon campaign against breast cancer, alternatively focusing on efforts linked specifically to their own brands equity and function. It has to be right for the brands voice, said Mr. Stengel. And it has to really work for the business.